By Adela Toplean | July 30, 2007 - 10:42 am - Posted in life 'n art
We are obsessed with solutions. Ever since we are very little, we are taught to reject the hopeless tasks. There is nothing so distressing as a solution-free problem. There is nothing so intimidating as an ambiguous signal we get from a life situation, from a friend, or from a stranger. We want our life events to be legitimate, solvable, predictable, controllable, structured and, if experienced in public, politically correct. Those who failed to come up with a solution for their own problems are labeled as “unprofessional”, “inferior”, “sick”, or, even worse, “irrational”. Moreover, it is abnormal to set a hopeless task. The – often painful – awareness of having a non-practicable plan is, according to modern (clinical) thinking, close to either paranoia or to severe anxiety. However, we no longer like to talk about separating the real from the illusive, we are hypocrite enough for only talking about feasible and non-feasible plans. The more evident the lack of solution for a certain problem, the less likely for that problem to appear on “healthy”, “reasonable”, “successful” persons’s agenda.None of Ingmar Bergman’s characters ever found a solution. None of them had a “master-idea”. Some of them survived by mistake. Some others, by will. Some died or got mad of exactly the same causes. Or for the same reasons. They moved through a medium of intentions, suppositions, illusions and needs without having the slightest sense of direction. They had no civic consciousness. They promoted nothing and nobody except themselves and their solution-free problems. The hopeless Elisabeth Vogler is the last honest woman known by modernity. And Anna’s irrational passion is the last passion to be experienced by a modern human. Bergman, at his turn, is the last reliable director who suggested warm, distinct, non-viable solutions.






