By Adela Toplean | December 30, 2009 - 12:41 pm - Posted in life 'n art

Feeling overwhelmed is easy. And it’s usually for sale which makes things even easier.

An intense cinematic experience, sad, faultless acrobats at Cirque du Soleil, sad, faultless Madonna shows, Jacko’s death, my friend’s odd piercing: empty thrills that worth so much less than the luxury of a slowly built preoccupation. Too many tears, so little sweat; too much stupefaction, so little mystery.
I can be shocked, moved, puzzled or inflamed, but can you stir my interest? Can you? Can you really?

PS: Nancy Sinatra‘s album Nancy Sinatra from 2004 is still a favorite. Morrissey’s song “Let Me Kiss You” is troubling, like all things involving Morrissey. “Burnin’ down the spark” is subtle-rhythmed, perfect for driving, “Baby’s Coming Back To Me” fits a Sunday morning like a glove. Eventually the album is elegant and steady. After years of listening, I still find it chic and womanish, in the French-music sense of the word. Try it here.

And HAPPY NEW YEAR!

By Adela Toplean | December 28, 2009 - 3:59 pm - Posted in life 'n art

…and then the beast in you laughs at you. Louder and louder.

PS: Merz, “Verily”. One of the most beautiful songs I’ve ever heard. And I mean it.

By Adela Toplean | December 22, 2009 - 10:54 am - Posted in life 'n art

The propensity to hope. This is something highly specific for human beings.

This is also something that  keeps all Gods lazy, sitting idly, with their iPods on full-blast, flipping through glossy magazines, always absent-minded, always cool and laid-back. They never got to use the keys of the billions of vaults where human misfortunes, failures and sorrows lie buried, locked up from very early infancy to the morbid age of 98.

You’d better put yourself at ease by constantly wishing and hoping. Because  contrary to general belief, no religion needs desperate people. Desperation, my friends, counts as a mortal sin per se.

OK. So this was my little Christmas thought. I hope you found it encouraging.

PS: …and, of course, a fine, Christmassy musical present to all of you wise people reading this blog: Ronnie Lane & Steve Townshend from the same acclaimed (by me) and underrated (by everybody else) album Rough Mix: Annie: Winter has come, Annie/ No strength in the sun, Annie/ And when it’s gone, Annie/ Where shall we be?” Exquisite beauty.

By Adela Toplean | December 20, 2009 - 3:05 pm - Posted in life 'n art

Under almost any life scenario, you’re denied, shut down, contradicted, discredited, disbelieved, dismissed, rejected, nullified. It’s crazy, it’s unconventional and it’s bizarre to be accepted, confirmed or genuinely welcomed. The more you strive for perfection, the more you’ll be blamed for imperfection. The better you try to be, the more severe the punishment.

…I can see you right now, failing abominably to hold your head up and plead not guilty.

PS: New painting called “Higher Than Me”, oil on canvas, 100/160 cm. Pretty big surface, pretty much work. And no need to speculate, it is a self-portrait. Unfortunately I failed to take a really good picture (because of the size), so I’ll post the painting from a couple of angles.

PS2: When The Who met Small Faces amazing tracks  were born. More precisely, Pete Townshend and Ronnie Lane: “Heart To Hang Onto”. I can’t stop playing this Rough Mix album…

PS3: Maybe you’ll find this of interest: www.fusionembassy.com

By Adela Toplean | December 11, 2009 - 7:41 pm - Posted in life 'n art

Picture;5 024Once upon a time, there were two men: a mediocre realist painter and a mediocre writer of spiritless,  fashionable stories.

It happened such that the first was impressed with the two huge moles on the face of the second.

The painter decided the writer’s moles just needed to be painted. And thus a portrait was executed in a standard, unexceptional manner. However, the two painted moles were indeed extraordinary. No one has ever seen anything more vivid, more substantial, more repulsive.

Those painted moles were simultaneously a sample of craftsmanship and a token of the great inspiration our painter was stricken by. The portrait has soon been considered a fine piece of realism, and its model has soon become a fascinating, intriguing, veridical writer, driven in his art by the tragic story of his moles.

All in all, the two moles made the two artists famous. They were the key, the motto, the reason, and the fundamental engine of their art which has suddenly received worldwide recognition. New meanings were to be found behind their apparently ordinary writing and painting skills.

Critics have written about our painter’s obsession with apparently innocent deformities hence with human imperfection leading ineluctably to the idea of metaphysical failure. Psychoanalysts, at their turn, have spoken about our writer’s literary fixation on dispassionate literary scenes to mirror a sophisticated system of repression of guilt due to his mole-problem; which led, in fact, to the guilt he felt because of repressed libidinal impulses such as strong sexual and aggressive desires.

One day, an innocent young student who passionately conducted her PhD thesis in the art of her beloved master discovered something extraordinary: the  mother  of the writer, too, had the moles!

The news of this remarkable genetic heritage has spread immediately in the most serious niche  publications and we must say it led to a storm controversy in all those exquisite literary circles.

It was, from that moment on, clear to everyone who bothered to keep their eyes and ears open that the artist’s writings expressed the tragic dilemma of he who could never overcome a simultaneous love and hate relationship with a desired yet stigmatized mother; which led, of course, not only to an extraordinary degree of insecurity, guilt and anxiety, but also to a ferocious ambition and wonderful sublimation skills also known as the classical ingredients for making a worldwide artist out of a timid, neurotic  next-door guy.

It was now also clear that the brave painter had the extraordinary intuition of all these. He was the first to see through the two big brown moles, as through holes, deep inside the writer’s tormented soul; and found something that we may call these days the very human essence:  “I may not seem quite right, but  I’m not f***d up, not quite”. He, our painter, has seen all these and laid them on his canvas.

This apparently simple physical imperfection made any creative idea seem useless. Our painter needed nothing but this great, real detail: two moles on a writer’s face.

At his turn, our writer needed no talent, except this dramatic reality: two moles inherited from his very mother.

Some of the most courageous experts  soon dared to predict a suicide of the artist. They however didn’t tell which of the two are to commit suicide, so we could only assume it might have been both  (also taking into account the rumors about a presumed sado-masochistic relationship between the two.)

Due to the apparent accessibility of the theme, they’ve become not only valuable in high circles, but also popular among the masses. The writings of the possessor of the moles, the writer himself, as well as the paintings  of the moles together with the painter himself made it not only in the greatest exhibition museums and publishing houses around the world, but also in malls, pubs, public spaces and yellow media. Everyone seemed happy to agree upon the fact that physical beauty is not a requirement for pleasure and even less for art, fame and fortune. It takes two big hideous moles to make two men whole. And so the moles  were  shown in Vogue, in glossy men’s magazines and moreover in a Lady Gaga video being filmed as we speak.

After a short while of exposure to limelight, women rated moles among the sexiest physical accessories a man can have. “The bigger the better”, “Size Does matter”, “I want Your Mole” and “In Your Face” to mention a few of the most common titles in the glossy written reports of the latest months.

Sooner than expected, some weaker men have gone a little bit too far and bought at least one fake rubber mole on their cheeks and noses, just to get more attention from the ladies at cocktails and parties.

Damien Hirst however has been, as expected, a little bit shaken by the news and decided to put an end to this ridiculous mole story by exhibiting his latest masterpiece: two huge brown moles covered in diamonds. Our painter found the gesture completely unethical and  expressed his disagreement with Hirst’s work in prime-time on CNN.  He was later advised not to stop here, but sue the British artist and deal with him once for all. “This might be the end of him”, insisted one of  our painter’s advisers.

Our writer however didn’t agree with such harsh measures against one of the most prominent children of late modern art. Unlike our painter, he was a pacifist, or to be more precise, a conflict fearer. It was rumored that later that night, right after the public embarrassment of Hirst on CNN, he phoned our painter and begged him to calm down. The two moles belonged to him only after all, so he can sure do whatever he wants, including letting Damien do some clever work on them. When our painter has finally agreed to calm down and admitted  that yes, he was a little bit jealous and not really ready to share the moles with other artists, our writer also agreed it was perhaps the time to get a bit more realistic. The outcome of the long phone talk was the possibility of registering the two moles as a trademark. One hour later,  their common secretary was dragged off from bed by a phone call. She was asked to set a video conference  for 9 a.m. the next day with their two agents and six attorneys.

To our knowledge, the legal procedure of registering the moles as a trademark has been completed in no more than 5 weeks. Today is up and going, as you’ve probably already heard on the news.

PS: The above story was inspired by a certain remark I’ve read in Dostoevsky’s “Diary of a Writer”.

PS2: This is a song that my husband loves a lot. It comes from that amazing 60s garage collection… “Miracle Worker” by The Brogues. Shake it!!

By Adela Toplean | December 7, 2009 - 5:45 pm - Posted in life 'n art

06122009(019)Apart from its obvious (commonly known as nasty) characteristics, moving from one house to another also involves a failed attempt of retouching yourself.

For a start, you’re forced to take yourself from the beginning; to rethink your past, present and future, to look at your living as if it’d be someone else’s, to find a way to put up with a long enumeration of objects of uncertain value, dozens of boxes  carrying your decomposed self into priceless and useless pieces. And that’s where the existential discomfort begins.

Spoiling the natural hierarchy of objects and temporal processes that took place within you by throwing away all the stuff you think you won’t need, rearranging the rest according to some newly invented rules and actually believing you’ve just reinvented your lifestyle  is nothing but a feeble revolt against yourself.

However once you’ve reached the new place you’ll again be surrounded by objects of uncertain value and you will then have to admit that you haven’t invented any new living rule worthy to be followed, that you haven’t quite taken any salutary decision, that you haven’t quite thrown away the stuff that really perturbed you, all you’ve actually done  was producing  exasperated, hasty, neurotic gestures to ease your physical effort and save some valuable, objective time.

It is, in fact, exceptionally difficult to take some relevant decisions for interfering in the “inner workings” of your  own destiny. It is, in fact, exceptionally difficult to move yourself along with your furniture, books, shoes and plates. They’ll be going on. You’ll be staying still.

PS: I kept thinking about my favorite cover project of all time, but I couldn’t possibly take the risk of deciding upon such an important matter. However a temporary solution came to my ears while jogging in the park the other day. The cover album I’m refering to is about two years old. I loved it enormously back in 2007. I still love it today. I believe it makes a perfect winter holiday soundtrack: it’s Robert Plant and Alison Krauss’s Raising Sand. Brilliant concept. Get a taste here.

PS2: The strangest photo I’ve taken lately can be seen above. I even felt like giving it a name: “The Dying Circus”.

By Adela Toplean | December 3, 2009 - 12:31 pm - Posted in life 'n art

28112009(001)Failings and successes do not lie within the natural scheme of things, but within a (well?) intentioned scheme of supra-things.

People should be told right into their face that the path they choose with their beating heart and by the sweat of their brow is rarely – if ever! – the victorious path. Because life itself does not “carry” any failings or victories; life is something else.

PS: Sorry for the long break. Now back to normal. Moving was a nightmare. Maybe I’ll post some reflections about it sometime in the near future. Meanwhile, the cover-series goes on with The MonkeesI’m Not Your Steppin’ Stone” (what an amazing tune!). Per Gessle gave it a try in his 2009 European tour. This is the Amsterdam attempt.