Old post re-written for new purposes. I felt that the right time is now. The comments and the PS’s are certainly not actual anymore. That particular issue of The Word was found, and I grew calmer (and wiser), a committed supporter of moderated discussions.
What is it that we want?
None of us would admit wanting extravagant things; none of us would mention the moon or the lottery luck, the Rolls Royce or the private jet, the Brad or the Angelina, the Nobel or the Grammy. When asked, we answer decently, predictably, rightfully: we want love, health, peace in the world and good schools for our children. Which is, of course, nothing but the truth, nothing but the proof of our sticking to the right cliches, to those beautiful clichés which are always able to refresh our sense of reality.
Vulgarity – in all its known or suspected forms – is completely absent from our wishing lists; and so is a supposed “sympathy for the devil”.
According to the public wishing lists, everybody loves and nobody hates; everybody’s reasonable; nobody’s fooling around with the green projects, with the marriage institution or with the children rights. We live in a fundamentally good world and that’s why we don’t even bother to discuss the causality of evil anymore.
Our goodwill ambassadors know exactly where to go and whom to feed, we have magazines that tell us (see the 1st issue of the Intelligent Life, the newborn child of The Economist) how to make efficient charity, we have academic departments lecturing and discussing religious pluralism, we have hundreds of militating NGO’s to teach us positive discrimination in three steps.
Who said that progress doesn’t exist and who said the world can’t be saved from collapse by some wonderful wishing lists put together by thoughtful fellow-humans?
There is one little problem still: we are not our wishing lists. Would you really want to have access to the uncensored to-do’s lists of your fellow humans? I don’t think so.
We are not what we want. We are what we crave. And when it comes to craving, we’re no better than children, and we’re no better than the pets we have in care.
Craving has a space of its own, a lawless space. We gladly give a righteous action for an illicit attempt; or two years of reasonable public glory for a moment of completely ridiculous intimacy; we raise two children, and make four abortions; we buy wooden toys, and then waste 4 gallons of water washing the asphalt yard.
And all these because we have a very… labyrinthine way of interpreting the rules of the games we play.
We have troubles with seeing things in their full dimensions. We’re born with a fascination for our own deficiencies, just like the 3-year old kid’s fascination for his own poop. We’re interested in corruption, in losers, in adultery and warcraft. We’re interested in crowds, in total power, in depression and weakness, as well as in the whole process of finding an alibi. We fix this, we break that. And viceversa.
And so we have an ambivalent relationship with our own wishing lists. It is not easy to make relevant, practicable and efficient distinctions between aspirations and cravings. We’d rather go for a “dialectical” understanding of both. So that our paradoxical ego can grow bigger, darker, greener, worse.
PS: Leonard Cohen and Lou Reed were the kings of the weekend. I know I have written before about Reed’s “Coney Island Baby”, but I just keep noticing how my heart is racing when this song is playing. Plain beauty in terms of both music and lyrics.
And by the way, if anyone can find the interview that Cohen gave for The Word magazine in the July 2007 issue, please give me a call. I have been looking for it all over the internet, Amazon and eBay. No luck.